Gardena

Gardena

A team of lawyer, comprising of:

Carter Nickel, Mary Dime, Andrew Quarter, Arthur Halfpence, Donald Buckster, Steven Twobill

 

Cases

This case featured an African American Nurse subjected to a Mandatory unpaid Overtime at work and a Hostile Work Environment.

She reported the organization and has been targeted against.

Our firm fought that unlawful retaliation.

Result: We’ve achieved a verdict in the client’s favor.

As a part of our lengthy effort to help Ms. Monaghan, our team of lawyers went through roughly 6 stages in working on a case:

Legal Stage #1:

We’ve been assessing the case’s details, analyzing the odds of winning and how firm (legally speaking) our stand in it will be.

Legal Stage #2:

Gathering and filing all the paperwork on time is one of the most monotone job lawyers do but on the other hand one of the most crucial ones…

Legal Stage #3:

Cross-examining the evidence and interviewing Michelle’ colleagues was vital.

Legal Stage #4:

Rejecting an insufficiently good settlement offer was a hard, but a right thing to do, after which we’ve headed straight to the trial itself.

Legal Stage #5:

Assessing a jury, we came to a conclusion it looks favorable for our client’s cause…

Legal Stage #6:

After doing all the hard work we’ve been paid off – our client has won the case and a substantial sum of reparations in damage with it!

Just as usually with our legal practice, this case has proven once again that the hard work our team does will always pay off with a positive verdict!

As usually, at first we were just going through the case, seeing all of the details that might have had an importance for the further court hearing.

Ms. Monaghan has provided us with all the basic details about both the case, witnesses, documents and the company in general…

img11

Following an initial assessment, our team of lawyers and paralegals began to collect and systemize the evidence and analyze what exact amount of paperwork we’ll need to go through before the actual hearing begins…

img10

A logical next step was to confidentially put everything that Ms. Monaghan has told us so far to a check and a cross-examination for the details’ confirmation.

We did so by working with her former and current colleagues and the company’s managers featuring in the case.

img09

As we proceeded through all the fact-checking and company’s examination, the representatives of the firm where Ms. Monaghan has previously worked reached out to us to negotiate a settlement offer.

We recommended our client on rejecting it, as the terms of the offer were not adequate compared to the moral and factual damage inflicted…

img05

After rejecting an insufficient settlement offer, we’ve been preparing the case and our client for the court hearings.

One important part of that process has been to prepare for the jury which would preside over the verdict. As we’ve assessed the jury, we came to a conclusion that it will be favorable to our client’s cause…

img04

All in all, after a 3-month process of examining the evidence, gathering information and legal data and preparing for the trial, we finally were able to reach a positive court’s decision, which upheld our client’s rights and declared a positive verdict we’ve all worked hard to achieve!

img02

We review and accept your consultation

requests on a 24/7 basis

[pirate_forms]